← The Ring Ring journal

Parent guidance

The Anxious Generation phone alternatives, charted

Jonathan Haidt's four norms, the CDC data behind them, and what a phone looks like when a family actually follows the book's advice.

Jonathan Haidt’s The Anxious Generation spent more than a year on the bestseller lists making one argument: childhood moved onto phones around 2012, and kids’ mental health followed it down. Whatever you make of the causation debate (serious researchers do contest it), the book leaves parents with a practical question it spends less time on: if not a smartphone, then what, concretely? Here is the data behind the book’s alarm, and the device decisions its four norms actually imply.

What the CDC actually measures

US high-school students reporting persistent sadness or hopelessness, past 12 months

0%20%40%60%2013: girls 39%, boys 21%39%21%20132021: girls 57%, boys 29%57%29%20212023: girls 53%, boys 28%53%28%2023GirlsBoysDashed: survey is biennial; 2015–2019 not shown.
Source: CDC, Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data Summary & Trends Report 2013–2023

Three things are true at once in this chart. The rise Haidt writes about is real: 39% of girls in 2013, 57% by 2021. The burden is not evenly carried: the girls’ line sits roughly twice as high as the boys’. And the newest data point bends the right way: 53% in 2023, the first improvement in a decade of surveys. The CDC called the 2023 numbers “a glimmer of progress”: a reason for resolve, not relief.

The four norms, translated into decisions

The book’s prescription is four collective norms. Each one is abstract until it meets a shopping decision:

  • No smartphones before high school. The decision this forces isn’t “no phone.” It’s which non-smartphone. Kids still need to call grandparents and friends. That’s a screen-free phone, a kids’ landline like Tin Can, or a talk-and-text cell like Gabb. We priced all of them in the companion piece.
  • No social media before 16. Easiest to keep when the feed physically isn’t in the device. A filtered smartphone enforces this norm through ongoing vigilance; a phone with no screen enforces it through physics.
  • Phone-free schools. Largely out of your hands, and moving fast: most US states now restrict phones in school in some form. A home-based phone is the rare device this norm never touches.
  • More independence and free play. The norm parents skip, and the one Haidt weights most. A kid who can call the neighbor kid on their own, with no parent brokering a playdate over text, is practicing exactly this. It’s the argument for giving the kid a phone of their own, just not a smartphone.

What following the book looks like at our house

Full disclosure: we make one of the options. Ring Ring is a home phone built for the first norm: a real handset on the kitchen counter (or any analog phone you already own), a Trusted Circle only a parent can edit, and independence for the kid inside it: they dial their people themselves, no screen involved. From $59 with a $0/mo plan between Ring Ring families. The honest comparison with every alternative, including our competitors’ strengths, is our first-phone guide.

Whatever device you land on, the book’s deepest point survives the researchers’ arguments about effect sizes: the norms only work as norms. One family delaying alone is an argument at home; five families delaying together, with a way for their kids to reach each other, is a childhood.

Sources